science and technology the most prone/diverse of simulacral terms - the meaningless, ubiquity and logodefinition with temporalities.
divine absurdity - far from crucially, the medieval logomatrix is the inversion and totality of nothing, which overtakes and populates everything - the great inventory capacity of linguistic technology takes up no physical space - an auditory stimulus is still inevitably bound up in multiple processes, but a purely visual cue moves towards a technical sectioning of locatability, transferability and the abstractive. god, ideally, is a nothing - nothing is inevitably applicable to any identifiable thing - it is the directive to love while its very logo-reflexivity make it absurd and unnegotiable. the absurd is eternal, undebatable/transferable, it uses language perfectly in completion and symbolic totality.
the wittgensteinian language game is in mastering - subverting its rules - reducing them to the arbitrarity of their source. the idealized language is irrefutable in its game. the advent of a conversation: i don’t believe that is true. - well, ______ says that it is true. the truth game is always an impossibility as it renegotiates a place for language that asserts what its own absurdity cannot. the paradoxical demands the entirely translucent - the “honest”. the game presupposes a decision of trumping. in order for the fantastic to exist, it needs a meaningless equation that incurs both its practicability and its necessary immobility. authority, professionalism - to assure and provide grounds to sustain a populace, we need decisions - true, not everything is best for everyone, but one must be decided - or is regardless. the transfer of power is verbal or in its own medium. what do i believe? what’s true?
truth unnecessarily as a duality of subjection and humiliation. what humiliates? a word is born. as saussure has it, its symbolic-semantic relation is anything. ali g proposes to chomsky to make up his own language - chomsky says it will fail, no one will listen - but how can he get others to listen? invented languages, literary games, esperanto et al. - the simplicity of a logical grammar and the counterpoint of internet language which maddeningly gets it all wrong. is the grammar correct? according to __________, x is y and z is a. not truth, but an infallible source of subjective and humbling truth.
scientific conclusions, its language, the neomedial structures in different technologies, technospeak - these are the highly defining nodes of contemporaneity - the artistic endeavour to embellish these is precisely the novomoronicism which gives play to the very symbolic arbitrarity that governs it originally - the ultimately untimely, disjunctive and inept, however, fail to grapple correctly with its implications - technospeech and its ideologue gives primacy to a recursive post-baudrillardian simulacral totality - the seduction of the image is precisely its non-existence, its xeroxability - breasts can be made bigger, desire can be remapped and calculated - the post-industrial resistance is located not simply in the body, but in its proliferating ineptitude - the technological multimasquerades as a sitcomed solution to the ficto-sublime, and the germinal alterity proliferates into a kind of reverse-mirrored spectrum of unpredictable freak shows. the visibility of the shock site surfaces as a kind of dark fleshly secret which was stored in germline cells, but was never transcribed to fruition - the womb and timely cybermother of the internet was not yet born. nonsense is the mirror to the fleshly sublime, the interrogated and axiomated intestinal warps that make up innovation. the new is conceived in spit and exfoliation, nonsense is quite simply not nonsense at all, but the utmost in pragmatism, the most crucial and the most invisible in its sidereality. authority is defined in the hyperintensified seeking of nonsense - the undergrounding of the textural in a formative eternity. conclusions of science are mapped irrevocably against the idiotic sublime - the temerity and incrementality of ranting, and the collected retraction of definition and random conclusion. nonsense proliferates in the globalized and the properly mapped, the distinctly “anti-nonsensical” - the idea of simplicity and a creative mechanism of organ innovation.
